Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät

Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät

Marsoni

M251S

$167.04

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne LadegerätLieferumfang: 1x Makita DTM 52 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 1x Zubehr Set 1x Segmentsegeblatt TMA045 Wood & Metal 85 mm ( B 64799 ) 1x Tauchsgeblatt TMA047 Wood & Metal 32 x 50 mm ( B 64814 ) 1x Tauchsgeblatt TMA059 Metal 32 x 50 mm ( B 64939 ) 1x Tauchsgeblatt MAM001 Wood & Metal 32 x 80 mm ( B 66400 ) 1x Delta Schleifplatte 30x Delta Schleifpapier ( 10x P60 10x P100 10x P150 ) 1x Makita BL 1840 B 18 V 4,0 Ah Akku ( 197265 4 ) 1x Makita Makpac ohne

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Makita DTM 52 M1JX4 Akku Multifunktionswerkzeug 18 V Starlock Max Brushless + 1x Akku 4,0 Ah + Zubehör Set + Makpac - ohne Ladegerät in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

We have ordered Van Heusen dress shirts in size 16.5 neck and 36”-37” sleeves for years. This shirt’s sleeves are 2-3” too short! The shirt is tagged wrong. I ordered the same size brand and shirt in a different color and you can see the difference in the sleeve’s length in the photo! Annoyed I need to return the defective item.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2025

Verified Purchase

The ABC Family

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 5

Excellent shirt that compares to box brand stores and fits very well.

Size: 15"-15.5" Neck 34"-35" Sleeve, Color: Light Blue

I recently lost 44 pounds and all of my dress shirts no longer fit correctly. These are an excellent replacement. I am 6'2" and now 180 lbs. These are a perfect fit and are slim where they need to be and don't bunch up on the sides, and they are super comfy. Bottom of the shirt is long enough to keep tucked in even when bending over. Sleeve length is decent, they do slide up past my wrists when doing extreme reaches, but are right at the hand/wrist connector when in an idle pose. They did have a weird chemical smell when I first put them on, but let them air out when you first put them on. They are also very wrinkled, so make sure you have an iron around. No status on durability, but the material is not super thin, its thick like Target shirts.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026

Verified Purchase

D. Barnett

Port Orchard, US

★★★★★ 5

Good fit, good quality, great price

Size: 16"-16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: Carbon

I ordered a few of these in different patterns. They fit great (I used to be a L/XL, now I'm down to a M/L). The price is a third of similar shirts from other Men's stores and fit the same. They look great with jeans or slacks, tucked or untucked, with or without a jacket.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026